If the ranking criteria for NBA stars are determined by James, how should he set it to rank first

The historical status ranking of NBA stars is actually very controversial.

On the one hand, basketball is a team sport after all, so there are many reasons not to admit failure. For example, Duncan led the Spurs to defeat James' team three times, but James does not have to admit that he is not as good as Duncan.

On the other hand, many stars do not belong to the same era, and if they are not leading in head-on battles, then the only thing they have never met before is "if". If Jordan were placed in the Cavaliers in 2003, they might not even be able to enter the All-Stars.

However, although it is very controversial, there are actually some common points!

For example, the fan media will use the total number of championships, personal honors, etc. to evaluate the historical status of a star. In fact, there is a very clear indicator, that is, dominance!

The most dominant people in the NBA are just two people, Bill Russell and Michael Jordan, one has 11 championships and 8 consecutive championships in 2013, and the other has 2 consecutive championships and 3 consecutive championships. The rest are almost interesting.

Recently, a NBA All-Star player LeBron James made a remark, saying that the championship is not important and hopes that everyone will pay more attention to personal honors. After all, sometimes it is not his own fault that he cannot win the championship.

This is very interesting, so if competitive sports don’t look at the final victory, will it see who will be more accustomed to the wrongdoing?

But unfortunately, even if the NBA's historical status ranking is not based on the championship, but on the runner-up, then the first place in history is still not James, because West is still there.

So, just be bold and let James define the ranking criteria for his NBA's historical status. How should James define indicators to make himself the first in history?

3 major hard indicators are definitely not good. In terms of championships, there are too many Russell, Jordan, and Kobe has 5. Regarding FMVP, Jordan has 6 FMVPs. In terms of MVP, there is one more Jabbar!

So judging from the three major hard indicators, James is not only not the first, but he is not even the second.

Since the three major hard indicators are not good, it can only rely on the "kilometer".

The total scorer of history is hope! The historical position should be ranked by using the total historical score.

But in fact, since it is all data and there are historical total scores, there will be historical total rebounds, total assists, total steals, and total blocks.

The historical total scorer is James, the total rebounding king is Chamberlain, the total assist king is Stockton, the total steal king is Stockton, and the total block king is Olajuwon.

From this perspective, Stockton has 2 historical data kings, James has only 1, and Stockton is the first, so it is not enough to rely on kilometers.

must use the ultimate move! James should always be the best in the best team.

James was selected into the Best Team 21 times, the first in NBA history! Kobe, Duncan and Jabbar ranked second in 15 times.

For the first round, James was selected 13 times, which is also the first in history! Kobe and Malone were selected 11 times, ranking second.

Therefore, if James wants to rank first in history, he can only set the criteria for the number of times he is selected for the best team and the number of times he is selected for the best team, so James is the first in history.

However, the best team is a regular season honor, and it is still out of the playoffs, but the championship is no longer favorable, so the playoffs will be even more meaningless.

So, the speech that the championship is not important should be changed to this:

I think the championship is not important, people should pay more attention to the best lineup. You know, the best lineup is very important, especially if you can be selected multiple times, that is very valuable, and the historical status should be determined based on the number of times you have been selected for the best lineup.