Follow-up discussion on renewal of the B fee, will you lose your reputation if you stay in the team? Team performance and player data can always be reduced

Attendance, let’s talk about whether B Fee will have a good end to stay at Manchester United. This question is quite interesting. When a player's discussion on staying and leaving is greater than the team itself, and even think that the player's stay and leaving is related to the team's future, this matter is an individual and overall discussion, that is, the player's data and team's data performance.

So, after hearing the news that B Fei stayed in the team, many comments focused on Manchester United's failure next season. This is to believe that the individual's energy is large enough to affect the whole. This is itself a recognition of B Fei. Another angle is that the overall team can no longer pull the individual. If it is too mysterious, then it can be understood as this: the existence of B fee lowered Manchester United's upper limit and lowered Manchester United's lower limit. The question is, is this really the case?

Sancho's reputation is an example: he was blessed when he left Chelsea. He failed to negotiate a salary with Chelsea. He asked for a weekly salary of 200,000 pounds but failed, so he was paid 5 million pounds by Chelsea. Do you think Sancho was a good end at Chelsea? Yes, when Sancho played for Chelsea, many local Chelsea fans scolded him, but when Sancho posted a message to say goodbye to Chelsea, most of the comments were blessed, so is this considered a good ending?

Many people will recall Sancho's 4 goals and 9 assists at Chelsea, and many people will praise Sancho for actually making some contributions to Chelsea. Although some of Sancho's nine assists are assists in the figure below, he passed the ball in a short pass in the midfield line, Jackson took the ball from the midfield and staged a one-stop. According to the rules, this is Sancho's assist.

This is when Chelsea scored data and left Chelsea, so I received a lot of goodwill blessings from Chelsea fans. Therefore, players with personal data generally don’t leave the team.

B Fei's personal data: It remains stable for a long time

Do you think B Fei can't get such data when playing as a midfielder at Manchester United? In Rashford's peak season, B Fee gave such assists, and in Greenwood's season with Manchester United, B Fee also gave such assists. Mainly Manchester United has fast horses on the wing, and even if B is in the midfield, he will definitely be able to play assist data, and there are still a lot of them.

Now Manchester United has signed with Cunya. Cunya is the absolute offensive core of Wolves when she was with Wolves. Tenhamhe's use of Rashford in his first season is actually somewhat similar to Cunya's role in Wolves. Cunya also often stages long-distance runs like Jackson, such as the Wolves' 2-0 Villa game, and Cunya has staged a long-distance run to score in midfield.

Mbeumo is also good at this routine, so as long as Manchester United has a speed monster in the frontcourt, a player with strong ball control and dribbling ability, and a player with shooting finishing ability, B Fee can play data in any position. Whether it is a high or a low, he will definitely be able to produce data. Do you think the title of the player with the most opportunities in the last five seasons has been so easy to get?

Therefore, B Fe's data at Manchester United have always been relatively stable. No matter where he plays, B Fe's data in Manchester United's goals, assists, passing to the offensive three zones and other data are among the best in Manchester United.

As long as B fee has data, reputation will not collapse, because someone will definitely help B fee speak. After the end of this season, I believe everyone has seen many comments: "If there is no B fee, Manchester United will be relegated." Everyone will use data to prove their views, and everyone has a different understanding of football. Therefore, as long as the B fee has data, there must be fans' support. If there is fans' support, will he be considered a good end or a reputation collapse?

When Manchester United lacked goals, Hoylen scored 4 goals in the starting center league, becoming the target of criticism. However, the two players combined accounted for half of Manchester United's shooting opportunities, the top 15 shots in the Premier League, and the bottom-of-the-shoot conversion rate of the Premier League. The reputation of B and Garnacho are obviously better than Hoylen. This is whether there is any difference in data. Everyone focuses on Hoylen.

Personal data, team performance is bad?

Then, the second question is, if B Fee can definitely play data at Manchester United, and Manchester United's performance is very bad. How do you calculate the reputation of B Fee? This is the process this season. B Fei is still one of the players who create the most opportunities in the Premier League. He ranks first in the frontcourt steals, assists, shots, goals, etc., and even the shooting data is more than the second and third places combined. Has B Fei's reputation collapsed?

Let me tell you this, as long as Manchester United scores rank in the lower half of the year, some Manchester United will definitely perform worse than B Fee. This player will definitely become the target of Manchester United's criticism, and this person will definitely not be B Fee. The energy of fans is limited, and the energy of the media is limited. If you want to curse, focus on the person you think is the worst, and it will be expanded to 2 or 3 people at most, such as Onana and Hoylen this season.

I tell you this, McTominay's average goals, assists per game, shooting conversion rate and other data in Napoli are the same as last season at Manchester United, but last season Manchester United was the eighth in the league, and this season Napoli is the Serie A champion. Sounds like this, did McTominay make great progress in Naples?

In fact, Mike cannot compete with Casemiro in the back midfielder position, and cannot compete with B Fee in the front midfielder position. He can only serve as a tactical surprise at Manchester United, and in Naples he is the main force of the iron attack. So, if you sell the B fee and sign another midfielder, your performance will be worse than the B fee? Don’t regret or upset after making a decision.

B fee contract: 2 years left

B fee contract with Manchester United is only 2 years left, and next year it will enter the contract year.. Many fans talk about the issue of B fee, which is focused on entering the contract year next year and will be 32 years old next year. It has been a long time since Manchester United has not received a transfer fee of 80 million to 100 million pounds, and Manchester United is a key summer window for lack of transfer fees, so everyone is dissatisfied with this.

Plus, B Fee is now more of the position where he plays in the back midfielder. Manchester United needs the most to strengthen the position is the back midfielder. He is the captain and has an absolute chance to play, so Manchester United doesn't have the courage to update and replace the back midfielder position. In the final analysis, it is not the result of this season, which has made fans lose confidence.

Let's put it this way, as long as Manchester United players do not show off their bad performance and their self-confidence does not collapse, Manchester United is the top six in the Premier League. Manchester United's problem has never been a question of player quality, but a question of players' attitude and confidence in the game. That is, what I have talked to you before. Instead of discussing who to sign, it is better to consider how many levels of strength the players signed can play in Manchester United.

I support selling B fee for transfer fees, because selling B fee can better represent the determination to rebuild. After Eriksen left the team, Manchester United needed a midfielder who was good at running without the ball, catching ball, and passing and dispatch. However, B fee stayed in the team, so he also supported him as a nanny type player, not a leading player.

We individually cannot influence the decisions of any club. Whether we are happy, unhappy, optimistic or pessimistic, Manchester United will not take care of your emotions. Just live your own life well. If you think Manchester United is too bad, then leave for a while and wait until Manchester United gets better before coming back to see it. That's all.