Comparison of physical test data and advanced data, which one is better, Michael Porter or Cameron Johnson?

On July 1, the Nuggets completed a deal with the Nets, and the Nuggets sent Michael Porter Jr. and a 2032 first-round pick to exchange Cameron Johnson from the Nets.

Many netizens think that the Nuggets made a profit in this deal. Let me compare the data of the two of them, and you will know who is stronger and who is weaker.

1. Height data comparison: Cameron Johnson-203cm, Michael Porter-208cm

2. Arm-span data comparison: Cameron Johnson-208cm, Michael Porter-213cm

3. Standing height comparison: Cameron Johnson-262cm, Michael Porter-275cm

4. Weight data comparison: Cameron Johnson-95kg, Michael Porter-98kg

In terms of body size, Michael Porter is definitely much better than Cameron Johnson, but Cameron Johnson's tall arm span is enough in the third position.

5. Season data comparison:

in terms of scores, assists, and steals, Cameron Johnson is better; Michael Porter is better in rebounds, blocks, and shooting percentage.

6. Comparison of high-order data:

Offensive efficiency: Cameron Johnson-110.9, Michael Porter-119.8 (the higher the value, the better)

Defensive efficiency: Cameron Johnson-116.7, Michael Porter-115.4 (the lower the value, the better)

In terms of high-order data, Cameron Johnson is only worse than Michael Porter in terms of offensive efficiency. The two of them are actually half a pound of defensive efficiency;

Assistance rate: Cameron Johnson-17.9%, Michael Porter-8.4% (the higher the assist rate, the better)

Assistance rate In terms of rate, Cameron Johnson is even better because he has a certain ability to hold the ball, and he can create scoring opportunities for his teammates by breaking through with the ball;

Real hit rate: Cameron Johnson-63.2%, Michael Porter-61.7%

Real hit rate: Cameron Johnson, he is not lower than Michael Porter. The reason why Michael Porter's shooting percentage is so high is due to Jokic being restrained in the interior;

Contribution value for game: Cameron Johnson-12.4, Michael Porter-10.1

Contribution value for game also proves that Michael Porter is not indispensable in the Nuggets.

7. Comparison of salary next season: Cameron Johnson - $20.54 million, Michael Porter - $38.33 million

Summary: Cameron Johnson and Michael Porter, two forward players, can be considered to have their own priority. In terms of playing style, I think Cameron Johnson will be better. Cameron Johnson has a high ball game, can run without the ball, cut empty, and occasionally can take the ball and attack by himself. At the same time, he also has certain organizational skills. There is no problem in replacing Porter Jr.

The key is that Cameron Johnson's cost-effectiveness is too high, which is 17.79 million US dollars cheaper than Porter Jr. The only thing to worry about is Cameron Johnson's attendance rate. He has not been able to play more than 70 games in his entire career.