Liverpool had a good start and was worried. Who was the biggest responsible person who was tied for 2-0?

August 16th news, Liverpool beat Bournemouth 4-2 at home in the first round of the 25-26 Premier League season, but this victory did not make many Liverpool fans happy because many people saw the hidden crisis.

Carragher smoothed out the game for coach Slott. He believed that Slott replaced Endo Kazuki and Robertson, and his original intention was to strengthen defense and fight defensive counterattack. Unexpectedly, after being scored a goal, the players got on the top. With a 2-1 lead, 8 players pressed into the frontcourt, but were hit again and counterattacked.

The first goal conceded is actually mainly responsible for Van Deck. Connate chased back desperately, but his speed was not as fast as Brooks. If Van Dyke could intercept the cross line, there would be no escort shot from Semen. We don't have to doubt the attitude of the two central defenders, but their abilities are limited, especially Van Dyke can no longer be required according to the previous standards. He is old and slow.

The second goal conceded, Bournemouth 4-for-2, Connate was indeed a little embarrassed. If he approached the Sitou and made a pressing goal, the Sitou and the Sitou would give the ball a better left-wing companion. Of course, retreating to the penalty area line is also a strategy. If you enter the opponent's shooting range, the last move of the senior central defender is to tackle. In terms of position, Van Dyke is more suitable for this, but when he gets old, he basically has no shoveling action.

Karrager, a hypocritical guy, dared not scold Van Dijk, so he carried Connat to criticize him, which was unfair.

But neither Konath nor Van Dijk were the main responsible persons for the two goals conceded. Who should be responsible for this? Sobosloy!

conceded the first goal, and his mentality was drifting when he led 2-0. He played with the ball on the ball and was cut off.

The second goal was conceded, and Salah's left foot hit the top of the arc, which was a little problem, but Sobosloy stood there and did not move. This was a bigger problem. He lost the ball again and was hit to counterattack.

Of course, from a global perspective, Liverpool's defense problems also include two full-backs who can only attack, which is also the reason why Slot replaced Kirkz and Flynnon. In fact, shortly after the start of the game, Sobo did not go to defend, and Flynnon did not go to defend, so he let Truffert make a cross from the arc and Semenuo scored a point in the penalty area and missed the shot. Then click the anti-blocking door to make an appointment with Kirkz, who is actually not defensive!

If you have higher requirements for the front line, Hakbo is the one who has a defense, and he is really very diligent. Ekitic and Wilz are doing averagely. They seem to be not very comfortable playing in the Premier League. The forwards have to defend, while Salah has no defense.

From the Community Shield to the first round of the Premier League, a concentrated impression of other Premier League teams is that breaking through Liverpool's goal, Sobosloy is a controversial player.

Sobo ran 11.5 kilometers in this game, so he was hardworking!

2 key passes, 3 shots, no goals.

My comment is that Sobosloy is not suitable for playing as a midfielder. If Slot must use him, it is more appropriate to let him rotate with Wilz and Salah.

Sobo's defensive weaknesses were fully exposed in the first game.

In the 6th minute, Truffert made a cross from the arc and Semen made a pass in the penalty area and missed the shot. Bournemouth's counterattack was also very fast, and new aid Truffert was here to fill the vacancy of Kirkz's departure. In the defense of this ball, Flynnon did not block Truffert's cross in time, and the more responsible one was the right midfielder Sobosloy. He was walking when the opponent was plugging in at high speed. Kirkz did not make any defenses against the door when he was behind the door.

Flynnon's right-side defense is difficult. Sobosloy often can run back, but no restrictions or interceptions are implemented, so it is not very helpful to the defense.

Sobo's defensive skills are average, and his attitude is fine. Once, he almost pulled Tavonier's arm off, but the referee did not even call the foul.

Sobosloy's second weakness is that his ability to transport forward is not good.

Liverpool's poor offense is superficial because of Wiltz's performance, but the real core reason is that the back midfielder cannot deliver forward.

For example, in the 33rd minute, Sobo made a straight pass forward under the opponent's double-team, but Ekitic failed to get it and lost the ball. This ball cannot be blamed for Ekitic for not stopping the ball well. It is too difficult to get it, and it is not passed well.

A minute later, Sobo stepped forward, Wilz's ball was done well, and Sobo lost his pass.

In the 41st minute, Sobo passed the ball to McAllister. The ball was not given well and McAllister was difficult to deal with. He lost the ball right when his opponent was close to him.

In the 45th minute, Werz retreated deeply and got the ball. He knocked back. Sobosloy made a long pass. The pass was too big. Salah could not get the ball, and the opponent's goalkeeper Petrovic cleared the ball with his big foot.

Liverpool needs someone in the backcourt to guide as accurately as Arnold, and now it seems that Sobo cannot do it.

After Graffenberg came back from the suspension period, his characteristic was to turn around and dribble the ball and send it straight to pass, which was also average for a long pass.

Football is a team project. Each player has a different position. Where are you in? First do your job well and then assist your teammates.

For example, Ekitic, if you are the center, you have to score a goal, and if you score a goal, you will be considered completing the task. Can there be any assists? That's the icing on the cake.

I can't see Sobo's actual role in Liverpool's tactical system. Don't always use diligent running and large-scale coverage to make excuses. As I said before, is running running, and then?