Lin Liangfeng: Giving up possession of the ball and lifting Haaland, Manchester City changed their approach.

. In the whole game, Everton only hit the goal 5 times, only a quarter of Manchester City's. Most of the offensive advances were exhausted in front of the goal. Bessey fell to the ground to block the shot. The ball hit his right arm from behind, and the referee ignored it. Also because Everton was forced to press forward in search of a goal, the space in the backcourt was repeatedly exploited by Manchester City. If he grasps it well, Harland can score three more, but either he pushes too far and loses the angle, or the opponent desperately tries to save him without giving him any time to adjust.

Everton's capital is on defense. If they lose the ball first, they will basically rest. Manchester City played cat and mouse, giving the opponent a little possession to lure the opponent away from the nest and then counterattack, which made Everton very uncomfortable. In these quick counterattacks, several of Shelki's direct passes were applauded. Harland's sprint alone was enough to defeat most opponents' defenses. Even if he didn't score, his teammates could still score points. There are also worries: If Haaland is not in form, such as against Monaco in the Champions League, or is even more unlucky to be injured, will this style of play that has been practiced for some days still be used? Does Malmouche like it?