The comprehensive and excellent data reflects comprehensive strength, and it is reasonable to get the MVP

Sica is more stable and has better defense.

The Pacers rose because Harry and the head coach had a very smooth offensive similar to the Peak Warriors, but the star level was not as good as the Warriors, and the fluency was very good. Halliburton averaged 21 points, 6 rebounds and 10.5 assists per game in 6 games. Siakam averaged 24.8 points, 5 rebounds and 3.5 assists per game. In this MVP selection, Siakam won 5 of the 9 votes, and Halliburton got 4, but unfortunately lost by just one vote. He shot a shooting percentage of 52.4%, and had efficient scoring ability.

Siakam has comprehensive data on rebounds, assists, blocks, etc., and has made many contributions to the team.

Siakam MVP is well-deserved forward and win awards better than guards. This is decided by basketball. Sika is just the weak version of Durant, the second leader. Halliburton is also the weak version of Curry.

Siakam, the ball is tough and he has a strong attack and rebound, but his free throw rate is not high, and he is worried for him every time he free throws.

The FMVP in the 15th Finals is even more outrageous. Curry scored 10 points more than Igo. Curry's team leader, he didn't vote for James that year, and Nike, the media is really shameless.

Don't look at Tatum's average data per game, but Brown is stronger at critical moments, and Brown is also the dominant high-level data, so there is nothing wrong with MVP in the East Final